courts
See this word as a collocate cloud
| the jurisdiction of the english | courts | however if a scottish paper |
| of animals it would enable | courts | of summary jurisdiction to disqualify |
| of animals it would enable | courts | of summary jurisdiction to disqualify |
| community care the draft sheriff | courts | scotland act 1971 privative jurisdiction |
| consider the following the sheriff | courts | scotland act 1971 privative jurisdiction |
| community care the draft sheriff | courts | scotland act 1971 privative jurisdiction |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 17 january |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 17 january |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 17 january |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 17 january |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 be approved |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 recommends that |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 recommends that |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 s1m 3816 |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 that the |
| child support appeals jurisdiction of | courts | scotland order 2003 that the |
| the jurisdiction of the sheriff | courts | to the scottish land court |
| the jurisdiction of the english | courts | would it therefore be for |
| portree and e peebles sheriff | courts | in i 1999 2000 ii |
| portree and e peebles sheriff | courts | in i 1999 2000 ii |
| haddington jedburgh peebles and selkirk | courts | in the categories of overall |
| haddington jedburgh peebles and selkirk | courts | in the categories of overall |
| old appeared in a sheriff | courts | and b the high court |
| of the district and sheriff | courts | and of the high court |
| the high sheriff and district | courts | concerned devolved issues and were |
| all who appear before the | courts | feel confident that the sheriff |
| how many cases before sheriff | courts | have been abandoned or lost |
| busy sheriff courts to district | courts | if there were a legislative |
| scotland act 1995 in sheriff | courts | in each of the last |
| scotland act 1995 in sheriff | courts | in each of the last |
| appeared on petition at sheriff | courts | in scotland charged with murder |
| section 40 of the sheriff | courts | scotland act 1907 other documents |
| section 40 of the sheriff | courts | scotland act 1907 the following |
| devolved from very busy sheriff | courts | to district courts if there |
| dingwall and d portree sheriff | courts | whether proceeding to trial or |
| can be tried before district | courts | a conditional offer is a |
| phyllis hands honorary secretary district | courts | association jim wallace qc msp |
| phyllis hands honorary secretary district | courts | association jim wallace qc msp |
| we took over the district | courts | in the mid 1970s and |
| the scottish executive which district | courts | mr sheils visited in the |
| the sheils report on district | courts | was due to be published |
| dealt with through the district | courts | with the same level of |
| work load that the district | courts | would have some of the |
| drugs roll out specialist drug | courts | across scotland support police initiatives |
| continued effectiveness of the drugs | courts | and calls on the scottish |
| early roll out of drugs | courts | and the provision of the |
| her individual needs 2 drugs | courts | bill aitken moved s1m 3641 |
| unionist party debate on drugs | courts | followed by executive debate on |
| national party debate on drugs | courts | followed by scottish national party |
| the work of the drugs | courts | in diverting users into effective |
| is the proposal for drugs | courts | in glasgow len higson may |
| possible remit of scottish drugs | courts | s1o 1816 18 mr kenneth |
| worked to make the drugs | courts | successful considers that further resources |
| offenders by establishing pilot drugs | courts | the success of drug treatment |
| offenders by establishing pilot drugs | courts | the success of drug treatment |
| offenders evaluate the pilot youth | courts | and extend them if they |
| a pilot programme for drug | courts | in north east scotland s1w |
| of orders from the drug | courts | are dealt with properly the |
| the executive s flagship drug | courts | have become a means of |
| a those sent to drug | courts | have committed only a minimal |
| who are sentenced by drug | courts | have the option of immediate |
| the term uk court scottish | courts | are scottish courts uk court |
| courts introduce access to the | courts | for non governmental organisations and |
| the possibility of specialist environment | courts | introduce access to the courts |
| court scottish courts are scottish | courts | uk court is meaningless in |
| borrower and to enable the | courts | to adjourn proceedings to enforce |
| borrower and to enable the | courts | to adjourn proceedings to enforce |
| this chamber about how our | courts | feel about the criminal justice |
| following instrument the international criminal | courts | immunities and privileges order 2001 |
| procurator fiscal service the criminal | courts | in glasgow are the busiest |
| principles of the international criminal | courts | scotland bill at stage 1 |
| the minister also mentioned youth | courts | the criminal justice scotland bill |
| prison service chaos in our | courts | a rise in crime particularly |
| prison service chaos in our | courts | a rise in crime particularly |
| prison service chaos in our | courts | a rise in crime particularly |
| support the police the police | courts | and the scottish prison service |
| levels of fines available to | courts | give priority in the prison |
| police officers and witnesses attending | courts | for trials that are cancelled |
| government the police or the | courts | official report col 3387 recognises |
| society s whole apparatus of | courts | police etc etc and probably |
| for justice when individual national | courts | are trying cases i have |
| that is available to the | courts | in sexual offence cases before |
| is automatically referred to the | courts | for breach of the order |
| order is referred to the | courts | only after three breaches s1w |
| therefore be for the scottish | courts | to implement such an order |
| been conclusively determined by the | courts | we cannot therefore discount the |
| justice system through the scottish | courts | administration which is blue compliant |
| together in improving the civil | courts | system make a liberal scotland |
| improving the operation of the | courts | system reducing the amount of |
| melodramatic but in the lower | courts | the system would collapse if |
| scottish public life including the | courts | and the law as a |
| union law in that scottish | courts | are expected to be the |
| castles stately homes and law | courts | many of which are not |
| power is there for the | courts | to act if necessary through |
| successful witness service to other | courts | introduce a national information and |
| be a matter for the | courts | or for the uk parliament |
| the justice of the peace | courts | in glasgow or the stipendiary |
| will the decisions of national | courts | be reported and collated in |
| to take place in national | courts | however proceedings may be commenced |
| automatically a matter for the | courts | and the breaching of an |
| matter had gone through the | courts | it was not possible for |
| the maximum penalty available to | courts | however the sentence passed in |
| glasgow or the stipendiary magistrate | courts | in glasgow because such environments |
| to be decided by the | courts | however it is clear to |
| under way in scotland s | courts | by improving the operation of |
| and the approach that the | courts | take in scotland scotland has |
| right to use gaelic in | courts | and tribunals and before other |
| is it made through the | courts | mark hazelwood the appeal is |
| been handed down in english | courts | i do not think that |
| the judgment of the english | courts | should rest on a narrow |
| zhao mends ance mair the | courts | o miravirtus our tale tells |
| position being overturned in the | courts | that led to our announcement |
| the future or how the | courts | will interpret our efforts at |
| avoidable homelessness by a enabling | courts | to consider personal and financial |
| avoidable homelessness by a enabling | courts | to consider personal and financial |
| is fairly obtained will scottish | courts | be able to review the |
| been collected by the scottish | courts | in fines for traffic offences |
| conference of the scottish university | courts | made it clear that it |
| rights of audience in scottish | courts | mr bill alexander will make |
| devolution issues raised in scottish | courts | since the incorporation of the |
| a potential resource in scottish | courts | the use of scots is |
| the bill by which the | courts | could resolve any such disputes |
| attendance orders were imposed by | courts | during 2000 s1w 17690 bill |
| view of practitioners and the | courts | the bill makes provision to |
| go further in the bill | courts | will not find the offence |
| 500 being imposed by the | courts | it is important that if |
| arguments being run in the | courts | on that issue we think |
| arguments being raised in the | courts | on this point because of |
| many accused people appearing in | courts | in the north east of |
| many occasions and in which | courts | s1w 31830 michael russell to |
| offences were given by the | courts | in 2001 s1w 34385 michael |
| for psychiatric assessment by the | courts | s1w 15111 mr kenneth gibson |
| arrangements to ensure that the | courts | and those involved in such |
| such matters out of the | courts | i move amendment 18 peter |
| executives as with legislatures and | courts | one of the three main |
| executive s view that the | courts | ruled that the three council |
| alternative disposals handed out by | courts | and panels in reducing future |
| be tested only by the | courts | but we believe that what |
| of named persons by the | courts | in circumstances where those persons |
| been determined conclusively by the | courts | so there is the risk |
| have been interpreted by the | courts | when the icc hears trials |
| they usually remain in those | courts | for four to six months |
| the legislation so that the | courts | can make a judgment on |
| investment in schools hospitals roads | courts | and other public services mr |
| action or inaction in international | courts | during the european year of |
| encourage additional usage of the | courts | in civil legal aid matters |
| issue for practitioners and the | courts | in dealing with major cross |
| possibility of challenges in the | courts | in serious circumstances simply over |
| have a case in the | courts | it will be based on |
| value on vindication in the | courts | lord penrose stated inviting quotations |
| that is emerging in the | courts | there will be a need |
| a challenge in the european | courts | to a european union directive |
| against challenges made in the | courts | to evidence gathered in accordance |
| avoid any challenge in the | courts | to the propriety of the |
| on the implications for the | courts | 5 abolition of feudal tenure |
| the transportation of prisoners between | courts | and prisons s1o 4662 27 |
| a large group of people | courts | could be delayed as a |
| of the external validation the | courts | have also examined the competition |
| a touch of the hampton | courts | i think with just a |
| members of children s panels | courts | should be more young people |
| result of pressure on the | courts | what it intends to do |
| allow the development of family | courts | which would include inter alia |
| scale work from the higher | courts | might come down my information |
| housebreaking we have introduced youth | courts | and fast track hearings to |
| wherever it occurs currently the | courts | do not have the power |
| placed on the accused the | courts | have held that that burden |
| new legislation and for the | courts | that have to apply it |
| new legislation and for the | courts | that have to apply it |
| precedents to come from the | courts | christine grahame is it your |
| would come roon the back | courts | singin songs an f606: mm |
| without having to involve the | courts | but concern has been expressed |
| so will mean that the | courts | can examine the sexual element |
| hebrides as trokers frae the | courts | o the norse keings o |
| accepted sentencing option for the | courts | s1o 4921 28 richard lochhead |
| with the executive and the | courts | the convener the executive has |
| buildings the gardens the tennis | courts | the swimming pools the terraces |
| mak representautiouns ti the europaen | courts | tho ingland wes telt ti |
| be clear enough for the | courts | to determine whether the design |
| specified offences that allow the | courts | to examine sexual behaviour both |
| minister just said that the | courts | vindicated the executive s position |
| be met and that the | courts | will be able to enforce |
| evidence is obtained fairly the | courts | will ultimately adjudicate on the |
| procedures might argue that two | courts | working under the same treaty |
| judicial appointments and finance division | courts | group and mike west civil |
| saturdays booked five a side | courts | on sundays jakey wilson was |
| fu pin tammas kent at | courts | o lawch ar aye gey |
| up ma hairt fish scale | courts | see an dragon haas yetts |
Top
